भारत राष्ट्र के लुटेरे, The vile Looters of India's Prosperity and Integrity, Part-1

If one wanted to have knowledge in any detail of the society and life of India before British dominance, the obvious thing to do was to carefully peruse the British-generated archives. The Noted Historian and Writer, Dharampal, very painstakingly, collected these archives. He became a regular visitor to the India Office and the British Museum. He copied them in long hand, page after page, millions of words, day after day. Thereafter, he would have the copied notes typed. He thus retrieved and accumulated thousands of pages of information from the archival record. When he returned to India, his most prized possession was these notes. Dharampal, in gave the study of archives the benefit of decades. His mind retained every detail of what he read with uncanny sharpness.

As per his book " Indian Science and Technology" regarding the state of Indian industry,  The author notes

"This picture that emerged from the total archival record was nothing short of stunning. Contrary to what millions of us were taught in our school text-books, it indicated the existence of a functioning society, extremely competent in the arts and sciences of its day. 
Its interactive grasp over its immediate natural environment was undisputed; in fact, it demanded praise. This was reflected in both agricultural and industrial production. We know today that till around 1750, together with the Chinese, our areas were producing some 73% of the total world industrial production, and even till 1830, what both these economies produced still amounted to 60% of world industrial production. Even in a moderately fertile area like that of Chengalpattu (Tamilnadu), our paddy production in a substantial area of its lands around 1760-70 amounted to some 5-6 tons per hectare, which equals the production of paddy per hectare in present day Japan—the current world high. A vast educational set-up—based on a school in every village—looked after the requirements of learning of large masses of young people.
The most impressive feature of the set-up was the elaborate fiscal arrangements made for its upkeep in perpetuity, if required. From the gross produce, amounts were allocated by tradition for the upkeep of the system, from the engineers who looked after the irrigation tanks and channels to the police and school teachers. In technology, we produced steel that was superior to Sheffield steel. We also produced dyes, ships and literally hundreds of commodities."

Dharampal also saw how it was all being undermined, how the British in fact went about pulverising the Indian economy and society.

According to Dharampal, the British purpose in India, perhaps after long deliberation during the 17th century, was never to attempt on any scale the settlement of the people of Britain or Europe in India. It was felt that in most regions of India, because of its climate, temperature range, gifted, industrious and dense population, the settling of the people of Europe would serve little purpose.
Therefore the purpose was defined as bringing to Britain and Europe, surplus products of the varied industry of the people of India, and the taxes imposed on this industry. Such a proposal, in fact, was very clearly put forward around 1780 by Prof. Adam Ferguson of Edinburgh. Ferguson was a professor of moral philosophy. (Interestingly, he is also regarded as the founder of British sociology.)
While discussing the mode of governing India, Ferguson raised the question of the purpose of this governance. According to him, the aim was to transfer as much as possible of the wealth of India to Europe. And this task, according to him, could not directly be conducted by servants and institutions of the British state. They would be too bound by rules and state discipline to do justice to the task. The transfer of wealth to Europe, he felt, would generally require the bending and breaking of rules as no major extraction or extortion from the ruled could be effectively done through instruments of the state.
He therefore felt that the direct governance of India should be in the hands of the servants of a body like the E.I. Co., where the servants could when needed disobey orders and rules. But the company should be controlled and supervised by a high-power body constituted by the state. It is this logic and arguments that eventually led to the formation of the Board of Commissioners for the Affairs of India in 1784.

The article indicates the healthy and happy state of affairs at the time of British advent. The study is important because this is still happening, and fuelled by the agents of missionaries governing this country sometimes directly, and indirectly through money and influence. 

Many of the evils that are attributed to Hindu law and administration, purposely distorted are in fact evils propagated by the missionaries and is still carried forward by their commie army. We read maxmueller was great and knew Sanskrit and so on. These blatant lies are spread by manipulated rulers of the once great country. Macmueller in fact distorted every good thing, for mean missionary agenda of demonizing Hinduism and mentally preparing then to convert. 

The mention of prosperity of India before British, as described in British archives themselves, is necessary to put and end to the value of paid historians, who say India is developed by British.